The best claim in the world is the one that never needs to be filed. We all know the cost and distraction involved in claim preparation or defense. We also know that claims are an unavoidable part of what can be a contentious construction process.
Given the inevitability of claims, knowledge is the best weapon. You need to put yourself in the strongest position in the shortest period of time and at the least expense. Whether you work for contractors or project owners, you need to manage the claim process to your advantage. You can’t build a business (or build ANYTHING) if you’re spending endless hours in unproductive claim preparation or defense.
The secret is to “claim-proof” your operations – by knowing the mistakes others have made, and implementing procedures to avoid them. But you don’t have all day to surf the Web or chat with colleagues about case law and best practices.
And that’s why we publish Construction Claims Advisor – MONTHLY PRINT EDITION.
Avoid Lawsuits When You Can – But WIN When You Can’t
Construction Claims Advisor – MONTHLY PRINT EDITION is a newsletter designed specifically for YOU – the busy professional who needs accurate, timely, utilitarian information on construction claims but doesn’t have the time to search for it.
Formerly available exclusively online, the Advisor is now available in print as well. Twelve times a year, each factpacked issue will keep you up to speed on the topics that are crossing your mind – and your desk – including:
- Scheduling A contractor submitted a construction schedule reflecting early completion of the project. Did this alter the contract completion deadline? Would a California court allow the contractor to recover delay damages based on the earlier date? Advisor readers know.
- Changes The Navy Facilities Engineering Command challenged a claim by a Florida contractor, contending that a specification for an enclosure implied the same material be used for equipment. How did the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals rule? Advisor readers know.
- Bidding A public project owner approved a low bidder’s replacement of a listed subcontractor after award of the prime contract. Would the Connecticut Supreme Court allow the displaced sub to pursue legal remedies against the project owner? Advisor readers know.
- Payment A private project owner and a general contractor ignored the terms of a construction escrow agreement, resulting in nonpayment of a subcontractor. Would the Missouri Supreme Court let them get away with it? Advisor readers know.
- Termination A public project owner deleted a substantial portion of a project. Did a California court consider this a termination for the convenience of the owner or a deductive change order? The answer could have a significant impact on the contractor’s recovery. And Advisor readers know the answer.
From site conditions to shop drawings…delay damages to estimating…unabsorbed overhead to acceleration…AND MORE – if it affects construction contracting,
Construction Claims Advisor – Monthly Print Edition readers know the answers. You’ll also know the case participants and will receive the annual case index at no extra charge.
